VWO and AB Tasty announced on January 20, 2026 that they are combining into a single company, backed by Singapore-based Everstone Capital. The merged business has more than $100 million in annual revenue and over 4,000 customers, with roughly 90 percent of revenue coming from the United States and Europe. VWO co-founder Sparsh Gupta is CEO of the combined entity. As of July 2026, neither product has been announced as sunset and no pricing change has been announced.
That last sentence is the one most people are actually searching for, so it is worth repeating plainly: nothing has changed for your account yet. What follows is what was announced, what was not, and how to think about your renewal if you are on either platform. Last updated July 2026.
What exactly was announced
The two companies entered into an agreement to combine, subject to customary closing conditions. This is a merger of two profitable businesses rather than a distressed acquisition, which matters for how it tends to play out. Everstone Capital, which manages about $3.5 billion and was already the majority shareholder in VWO, is investing additional capital and remains the largest institutional shareholder.
| Detail | What was announced |
|---|---|
| Date | January 20, 2026 |
| Structure | Agreement to combine, subject to closing conditions |
| Backer | Everstone Capital (majority shareholder in VWO) |
| Combined revenue | More than $100 million annually |
| Customers | More than 4,000 globally |
| Revenue concentration | About 90 percent from US and Europe |
| CEO | Sparsh Gupta, VWO co-founder |
| Product roadmap | Not specified |
| Pricing changes | Not announced |
Who runs what
The leadership split tells you something about the shape of the combined company. Sparsh Gupta of VWO takes CEO and Ankit Jain becomes Chief Product and Technology Officer, so product direction sits on the VWO side. AB Tasty's two co-founders move into customer and revenue roles: Remi Aubert as Chief Customer and Strategy Officer, and Alix de Sagazan as Chief Revenue Officer. When the product and technology leadership of a merged entity comes from one side, the long-run platform tends to be built on that side's foundation. That is a pattern, not an announcement, and it is worth being clear about the difference.
What was not announced
This is where most of the speculation lives, so it helps to be precise about the gap between what the companies said and what people are inferring.
The announcement did not say that AB Tasty will be discontinued. It did not say the two products will be merged into one. It did not say customers will be migrated. It did not mention pricing, contract terms, or renewal changes. It did not give a timeline for any product decision. Anyone telling you otherwise in July 2026 is extrapolating from how mergers usually go rather than reporting something the companies stated.
The honest read is that this is genuinely unresolved. Consolidations in software sometimes keep both products running for years because both have paying customers, and sometimes converge them once the roadmaps overlap too much to justify two engineering teams. VWO and AB Tasty overlap heavily: both do A/B testing, personalization, and behavioral analytics for mid-market and enterprise teams. That overlap is exactly why the merger makes commercial sense, and also why customers are reasonably asking what happens next.
Should you switch off VWO or AB Tasty?
Not because of this, no. There is no announced sunset, no migration deadline, and no repricing, so switching today would mean paying a real cost to avoid a hypothetical one. Migrating an experimentation platform means re-instrumenting your snippet, rebuilding running tests, retraining your team, and losing historical test data. That is a serious project to undertake on speculation.
The reasonable position is to keep using what works and treat your next renewal as a normal decision point rather than an emergency. If your renewal is months out, you have time to watch what gets announced. If your renewal is imminent, it is fair to ask your account team direct questions and get the answers in writing: is my product's roadmap committed for the term I am signing, and are the pricing terms locked for that period? A vendor that cannot answer those questions has told you something useful.
The question worth asking instead
There is a more useful question buried under the merger noise, and most teams never ask it: do you actually need an experimentation platform right now?
A/B testing works when you have volume. As a working rule you want roughly 1,000 conversions per variation per month to detect realistic effects, which on a page converting at 2 percent means about 50,000 visitors per variation. Plenty of teams pay for enterprise testing suites while running tests that will never reach significance, because the tool was bought during a growth plan that assumed traffic they do not yet have. The merger is a decent prompt to check whether that describes you. If it does, the renewal conversation is not about VWO versus AB Tasty versus Optimizely. It is about whether the line item earns its keep at all.
What are the alternatives if you do move?
If you decide to move, either now or at renewal, the field splits by what you actually need.
| Option | Rough 2026 cost | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Optimizely | Sales-quoted, often five figures annually | Enterprise experimentation and personalization at scale |
| Convert Experiences | About $299/mo billed annually | Mid-market teams that want transparent pricing and no feature gating |
| GrowthBook / PostHog | Free or open-source tiers | Teams with engineering time to self-host and instrument |
| Microsoft Clarity | Free | Behavior data only, no testing engine |
| Converto | From $19/mo | Auditing and rewriting a live page without a snippet or test volume |
Optimizely is the closest like-for-like at the enterprise tier and is sold the same way, with a sales cycle and an annual contract. Convert Experiences is the honest mid-market pick: it publishes its pricing, does not gate features by tier, and charges by tested users. GrowthBook and PostHog cover the open-source end if you have developers to spare, though the real cost there is engineering time rather than license fees.
Worth naming the trap: all of these still require you to invent the variations. A testing platform splits traffic and reports which version won. It does not tell you what to try. Teams routinely buy a testing suite, run it for a quarter, and discover the bottleneck was never measurement, it was that nobody had time to write and build a second version of the page worth testing.
Where an audit tool fits
That gap is why the audit step exists as a separate category. Instead of splitting traffic between two versions you built, you paste a live URL and get an assessment of what is weak on the page, plus the rewritten version to ship. There is no snippet, no sample size requirement, and no waiting for a test to reach significance, because you are not running a test. You are fixing known conversion problems.
That is what Converto does, from $19 a month. It reads the page you already have, scores the copy, layout, CTAs, speed, and AI-readability, and generates ready-to-ship variants. Suggestions are data-informed, not guarantees: the point is to give you a specific, defensible change to make rather than a promised number. If you later have the traffic to test, you arrive with candidates worth testing instead of a blank editor. For a fuller picture of the category, see our comparisons of AB Tasty alternatives and VWO alternatives, or the wider A/B testing tools breakdown.
What this means for the CRO category
Zoom out and the merger fits a pattern. Google Optimize shut down on September 30, 2023 and left the free tier of the market empty. Hotjar was absorbed into Contentsquare. Now the two most prominent independent mid-market testing platforms are becoming one. The experimentation category is consolidating upward, toward fewer, larger, enterprise-priced vendors sold through sales teams.
For a large organization with a dedicated experimentation team, consolidation is mostly fine and arguably good: fewer vendors, deeper platforms, more investment. For a founder or a small marketing team, it keeps pushing the tooling further out of reach, which is why the free and self-serve ends of the market have gotten more interesting rather than less. It is also why the practical answer for most small teams is no longer "pick a testing tool." It is closer to: get behavior data free, fix the obvious problems directly, and add a testing platform only once the traffic justifies it. The same logic is showing up across the marketing stack, where teams increasingly want the work done rather than another dashboard to interpret, which is roughly the bet behind tools that will run the campaign work on autopilot instead of handing you one more console to staff.
The short version
VWO and AB Tasty announced a merger on January 20, 2026, backed by Everstone Capital, forming a $100 million-plus revenue company with 4,000-plus customers under VWO co-founder Sparsh Gupta as CEO. No product sunset, migration, or pricing change has been announced as of July 2026. Do not panic-migrate over an announcement that has not been made. Do use your next renewal to ask whether you need an experimentation platform at all, or whether you needed the variants all along.
If it is the second one, you can paste your live URL into Converto and see what the audit finds in about a minute, no snippet required.
Paste your page and see what is leaking
Drop in any live URL and Converto audits the copy, layout, CTAs, speed, and AI-readability of the page you already have, then hands you ready-to-ship variants to lift signups and sales. Suggestions are data-informed, not guarantees.